<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Ai-Agents on Cyber Sins &amp; Security</title>
    <link>https://cybersins.com/categories/ai-agents/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Ai-Agents on Cyber Sins &amp; Security</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://cybersins.com/categories/ai-agents/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Cybersecurity in the Age of AI</title>
      <link>https://cybersins.com/cybersecurity-in-ai-era-and-threats-defense-what-next/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://cybersins.com/cybersecurity-in-ai-era-and-threats-defense-what-next/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Last year, a finance professional joined a video call with colleagues they believed they knew. The meeting felt ordinary. The instructions to move money felt plausible. It was not until later that the organisation discovered something chilling: the voices and faces on the call were not human in the way everyone assumed. This is not science fiction. It is the kind of scenario regulators and the World Economic Forum have discussed in connection with the &lt;strong&gt;Arup&lt;/strong&gt; case, where reporting describes a &lt;strong&gt;deepfake-enabled fraud&lt;/strong&gt; on the order of tens of millions of dollars. The details matter less for day-to-day work than the lesson: &lt;strong&gt;trust signals we relied on for decades—voice, face, urgency—are now forgeable at scale.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
